A federal court ruled Friday that President Obama’s regulation to protect small waterways from pollution cannot be enforced nationwide.
In a 2-1 ruling, the Cincinnati-based Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit delivered a stinging defeat to Obama’s most ambitious effort to keep streams and wetlands clean, saying it looks likely that the rule, dubbed Waters of the United States, is illegal.
“We conclude that petitioners have demonstrated a substantial possibility of success on the merits of their claims,” the judges wrote in their decision, explaining that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new guidelines for determining whether water is subject to federal control — based mostly on the water’s distance and connection to larger water bodies — is “at odds” with a key Supreme Court ruling.
The judges said they have yet to decide whether they have jurisdiction to review the regulation, but a
A friend's wife posted this online. I answered (I can't resist such challenges). I know the family from Hampshire-Mineral counties in West Virginia. But they travels a lot, and I don't know where the photo is from.
Do you have any suggestions? Or how would you answer? (Scroll down to see my answer.)
As usual, I'll send a Hangout email invitation 10-15 minutes in advance. You may also use the phone dial-in to participate by voice only (helpful for those with low bandwidth too).
Many (most) of the watersheds you folks are studying are due for very large rainfall totals in the next 24 hours. It will be very tempting for you (as it is for me) to witness and perhaps photograph rising rivers first-hand, but please have a safety plan and never drive through moving water.